On 02/12/04 Gard Spreemann wrote: > On Wednesday 11 February 2004 21:29, Wazow wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have recently upgraded to gentoo-sources 2.6.1. Now portage wants > > to emerge old 2.4 headers for some reason. What is causing it to do > > that? How can I avoid it? (I do not feel that application compiled > > with those is very safe to run).
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0007.3/0587.html > > Finally see the gcc-config line. Why does it show > > "[empty/missing/bad digest]" ? Is the portage broken or something's > > gone wrong in my tree? nope, nothing wrong at all, that's normal behavior. With -vp portage now tries to show the download size, this information is kept in the so called digests. But for some packages there is nothing to download which results in no digest for that package, however the necessary function does not differentiate between a missing and a broken digest so portage displays a generic message in case there is an error. We'll probably add another test to hide the message if there really is nothing to download, but for now just ignore it. Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
