On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 21:46, Arne Vogel wrote: > Greg wrote: > > > Seriously the only real value I see in this is for someone to search > > for security holes by looking at the source. Otherwise I see no > > reason anyone should be interested in Mickey$oft code. > > > > Greg > > Doesn't "sheer curiosity" count as a reason then? Though I wouldn't > want to risk a lawsuit just for curiosity, so I'll just wait for insider > comments! >
Curiosity killed the cat though... I am quite sure that I *will not* view any source code under nondisclosure agreements (or effective nondisclosure because of how the source was acquired) because I could never say that I would not use the ideas contained there in for my own projects. -- Tom Wesley
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
