On Feb 15, 2004, at 5:42 pm, Jeff Smelser wrote:
On Sunday 15 February 2004 10:13 am, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
... That might require a
little work on your part to train it and perhaps some scripts to
automate some useful processes, but that is what I use and my false
positive rate is 0% and my false negative rate is about 3% (meaning it
catches 97% of the spam).

What Bayes filter is good for this?? My Spamassissin isn't catching all my
spam.

I like Bogofilter. It needs some scripting to handle training, which is a bit of a chore to set-up. Let me know if you want copies of mine, which seem to work pretty well.


Stroller.


-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Reply via email to