On Wednesday 25 February 2004 03:33 am, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Grendel wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Jason Stubbs uttered the following immortal > > words, > > > >>I agree. But I would have assumed that, with your "superior > >> intellect", you > > > > It actually is superior, My IQ ranks at 165, and I am a life > > member of mensa. > > > >>would have noticed that all of those "soo" many choices have > >> defaults. Even if you "handt" used bugzilla before, wouldn't you > >> think that the defaults are there for a reason? It also > >> specifically says to not change the assigned field if you don't > >> know whom to assign it to. Isn't it obvious that the reason for > >> this is because the default receiver is somebody(s) that can > >> field the bugs correctly? > > > > Actually I registered, then I wanted to report a bug in which qt > > 3.2 wouldnt compile if a previous qt was installed. However the > > huge amount of options really confused me and I even read the > > tutorial but still I gave up. I finally removed my earlier qt > > libraries and then newer qt was able to compile cleanly. > > > > It certainly would have been much easier if some text which > > explains everything like your statement above was there. > > Even with my not-so-superior intellect (I.Q. of 136), it was easy > enough for me to file my first bug using the 'New' (not > 'New-expert') option in the bar at the bottom of the screen, which > guides you through creating a new bug. Everything is plainly laid > out with sufficient (IMO) descriptions. You may not have seen this > link, but give it a try
148.... smart enough not to join mensa when invited. I found their members quite full of themselves. Just my $.02 -- Regards, Ernie 100% Microsoft and Intel free -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
