[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I have some packages listed in my package.mask file, but generally I'm using the stable branch.On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 22:26 +0100, Antonio Coralles wrote: > Is there any reason why I should have multiple versions of automake and > autoconf ? I'm asking this because here is what emerge proposes: > > [ebuild NS ] sys-devel/autoconf-2.13 > [ebuild N ] sys-devel/autoconf-wrapper-2 > [ebuild U ] sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r6 [2.59-r5] > [ebuild UD] sys-devel/automake-1.5 [1.8.5-r1] > [ebuild NS ] sys-devel/automake-1.8.5-r2 > [ebuild NS ] sys-devel/automake-1.6.3 > [ebuild NS ] sys-devel/automake-1.7.9 > [ebuild NS ] sys-devel/automake-1.4_p6 > [ebuild N ] sys-devel/automake-wrapper-1 > [ebuild NS ] sys-devel/automake-1.9.4
Do you have ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"? Once I set that environment variable to install a misc. build and then forgot. Later I ran an emerge --pretend --deep world and emerge wanted to install all of those versions.
antonio
-- [email protected] mailing list
