Prelinking is definitely a good option.  I'd be careful with changing
the x server priorities.  I've heard it can do bad things with the
scheduler in 2.6 series kernels (this is just what I've heard
granted).  This http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/migration-to-2.6.xml
article for instance warns against it.

Nick


On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:12:27 +0000, Ian K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Noble wrote:
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > W.Kenworthy wrote:
> > | Rather than looking at kde/gnome, you might get better results by
> > | changing the xserver priority.  There were some threads on the
> > forums in
> > | the past on this with good results.  Some have also reported that
> > | compiling xfree (and xorg) with -Os can make a big difference to x/x
> > | apps, but I suspect that it would only help startup, and be very
> > | detrimental to continuous processing such as movie playback.
> > |
> > | You mention snappier menus etc - this is indicative that you do not
> > have
> > | enough resources to go around - if you up the priority for these
> > | actions, what is going to happen to your playback?  Moving to Kernel
> > 2.6
> > | with the appropriate scheduler may help here if you are still using
> > 2.4.
> > | - 2.4 is ultimately "faster" in terms of work processed, but 2.6 is
> > much
> > | more responsive to desktop actions.
> > |
> > | As a gnome user, I would also like to add to the other reply you got
> > | from a kde user.  gnome/kde are both resource hogs, and on older HW you
> > | *WILL* need to go to a lighter window manager to get decent
> > performance.
> > | I have used fluxbox successfully where gnome wouldnt cut it in the past
> > | - this not to put down my favourite window environment, but an
> > | acknowledgement that all that niceness comes at a (sometimes
> > | prohibitive) price.
> > |
> >
> > Another option which might give a better performance would be to prelink
> > KDE.  Information on prelink can be found at:
> >
> > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/prelink-howto.xml
> >
> > Mike
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQFB/yrtlJFYJP/fwTsRAv10AJ9EOrUstfF5nexQHjK7O07BrqXDWACdF6ts
> > Nmt81kDSOByr/GG+KjEB2tQ=
> > =fWnU
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > --
> > [email protected] mailing list
> >
> >
> Thank you very much guys!
> I will try that prelink thing and research the xserver priority.
> Thanks again!
> Ian
> 
> 
> --
> [email protected] mailing list
> 
> 
>

--
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to