On Thursday 17 February 2005 13:31, Mark Knecht wrote: > I presume that the 180 packages that emerged before this one are not > effected by this gcc change? Right. If they had been, they would have failed too.
--
t3h 3l3ctr0n3rd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Supermarket Deli Clerk and Student Programmer
OpenPGP Key Fingerprint:
0A65 EEFA B23A F0AC E6C2 C71C BEA0 E055 BE0E EC25
pgpRkvTmiaQWX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
