On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 01:05:55 +0100 (MET), Szakacsits Szabolcs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005,  Bob Sanders wrote:
> 
> > NTFS is a variation of VAX/VMS' original filesystem.  Internally at
> > DEC it was known as ODS2 (On Disk Structure 2).
> 
> This is quite interesting but are you sure? It's fairly well known that
> NTFS was derived from HPFS. Of course this doesn't exclude that HPFS could
> be a variant of ODS2.
> 

I always thought so too but since NT4 has some roots in VAX I wouldn't
be surprised.

<snip>

> 
> > As to comparing it...NTFS is a robust filesystem, but it's not usable
> > under Linux...well fully usable.
> 
> Yep, it's not fully usable but not really because of the widespread
> beliefs.
> 
> There are some myths about Linux NTFS support (like it's experimental,
> corrupts data, etc) even if they aren't true for about 3-4 years. The fact
> is read is fully usable and write isn't fully implemented yet. This means
> that the write code either isn't written yet, disabled or works fine.
> 
> The complexity of NTFS is comparable to XFS or Reiser4 what is worked on
> about 8+ developers full time, paid. The Linux NTFS kernel driver
> currently is developed by one guy voluntarily, in his spare time.
> 
> Also note that there are two completely different kernel drivers and the
> write support was disabled long ago for the original, NT4 NTFS driver that
> indeed corrupted a lot of Windows 2000 partitions because, among others,
> the driver didn't check the NTFS version for backard compatibility.
> 

There is another myth that you can't have reliable write support in
linux well at least if you're willing to compromise (not really native
kernel support ...). There is a way to use the native ntfs.sys driver
in linux so that you use the microsoft librairy via wine to access
their filesystem. Here's some links that are interesting :

http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive/
http://www.windowsdevcenter.com/pub/wlg/6261

Enjoy !

Jean-Francois

>         Szaka
> 
> 
> --
> [email protected] mailing list
> 
>

--
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to