Report this to http://bugs.gentoo.org/

On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 01:30 +0100, LluÃs Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> OH, I forgot. There is another error. There is:
>  tuplerow[row][column][sample];
> and that should be:
>  tuplerow[column][sample];
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 01:23:57AM +0100, LluÃs Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> > Hi!
> > In the manpage of "libpnm", there is an example of its usage. But there is 
> > an
> > error in it. Here is a triple 'for' from the example:
> > 
> >        for (row = 0; row < inpam.height; row++) {
> >            pnm_readpamrow(&inpam, tuplerow);
> >            for (column = 0; column < inpam.width; column++) {
> >                for (sample = 0; sample < inpam.depth; column++) {
> >                    grand_total += tuplerow[row][column][sample];
> >                }
> >            }
> >            pnm_writepamrow(&outpam, tuplerow); }
> > 
> > 
> > It's obvious that there must be a "sample++" in the third 'for'. Who should 
> > I report this to?
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > In its laws, society makes its mightiest collective effort to impose
> > predictability upon human behavior.
> >   - S. I. Hayakawa, "Language in thought and action"
> > 
> > --
> > [email protected] mailing list
> > 
> 
-- 
Ivan Yosifov.


--
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to