On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:54:51 -0600 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > > No, that's not the best thing. It break emails that use the reply-to > header for it's original (and standards-compliant) behavior. It may be > easy, but that doesn't make it right. > > Please read, if you haven't already, the document Andrea linked. >
And then read this one and then argue about it forever! http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml My personal view, from a large number of lists I have been on and remain on, is that reply-to munging has more advantages than disdvantages. Thats a personal view and there are arguments both ways. It seems that Andrea has changed back to munging, thanks for that Andrea. Frankly if it changes to no munging I will be disappointed, but my life will not be over. HOWEVER, I would say to you Andrea, or whoever else is in charge, please please tell the list before you make changes, and with a day or so's notice! -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- [email protected] mailing list
