-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:57:45 +0100 Ralph Slooten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | So, what are your experiences / views? > > reiser4 is unsupported to the extent that if you use it, you shouldn't > submit *any* bugs that occur on that box via our bugzilla.
This isn't a bug report, it's an evaluation of software, and a question being whether my evaluation of performance is correct or incorrect based on other user's experiences. I describe how I patched 2 vanilla kernel's to get reiserfs4 working, so why would I report this to Gentoo's bugzilla? This has little to do with Gentoo at all, except for the fact that I use it and that this is the gentoo-user list. All I am trying to do is to determine what the benifits are, if I gain any benifit from using it (or waiting to use it). The only way I can get a general picture of it in use is to ask, right? > If you use it, you *will* find bugs, and you will likely experience > data loss. I am quite sure there are bugs somewhere in it, which is why (again) I am asking if my results correspond to others results (speed). I did this test to compare speeds, not stability, although it should be fairly stable according to it's programmers who released version 4. Greetings Ralph -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCQ7NYAWKxH5yWMT8RAngrAJ9Ew0srl0xHOVhkeA+fiE4DTdKnlQCeMtYS /Q7b3XtLy5dMI5Tcp9fZnL8= =ad1B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] mailing list
