> >*sigh* I guess I just have to get over the fact that such a simple 
> >oversight has marked me a typical windows user, but seeing as how no one 
> >wants to leave my name out of this, I might as well try to respond 
> >constructively.
> >
> >As has been said, some people, like myself, are just a little newer to 
> >gentoo than others or by sheer dumb luck didn't make all the same mistakes 
> >as everyone else.
> 
> Dave, dear heart, get over yourself. My question was never about you, 
> per se, but rather about a class of users which you represent (which I 
> can't even specify except in extremely broad and general terms), and 
> your issue was just a convenient example of problems that such a class 
> of users can easily encounter.
> 
> And if you want to get all hung up on using the term "typical Windows 
> user" like it's an insult or curse, well, that's your issue, not mine. 
> With Microsoft having some 90% of the computer market, the vast majority 
> of computer users are "typical Windows users", so it better not be an 
> insult or a curse, cause we're way outnumbered.
> 

haha, well I do think of it as an issult to some extent, but consider the issue 
dropped.

> >How do we make it better? We could point out the exact offending file. Or 
> >say that an error was found while parsing config files or init scripts. 
> >There are plenty of things that could be done, but I'm not sure it's worth 
> >the effort in this case as it was just a simple typo that spawned this 
> >whole discussion.
> 
> Anyone can make typos, so this is actually a point of discussion, since 
> it is a common user error that can and has happened to all of us.
> 
> But I still want to know if pointing out the exact offending file (which 
>  normally is what happens, but this is seemingly a special case) would 
> actually be of any use to the "average (migrating) user", because if
> 
> /file/that's/causing/the/problem: where_and: what_the_problem_is
> 
> is not understandable to such a user, then it doesn't matter whether we 
> point out the exact offending file to the user, and if they don't read 
> the error message in the first place due to "cultural" factors, it 
> doesn't matter if the error is displayed or not.
> 

I agree, to many (whether they be typical windows user or linux newbie) the 
extra information would probably not help which is why I said such efforts many 
not be worth developer's effort.

> All I'm asking is why you, as a specific user who did not understand an 
> error message sufficiently to use it to solve your problem, did not 
> understand the error message sufficiently to solve your problem, in 
> order to discover how this and other error messages could be made 
> understandable to you and users similar to you in the future. Other new 
> (to Linux, to computers, to Gentoo) users are more than welcome to 
> submit some data. My ultimate goal is to contribute some assistive 
> resources to help you all over the hump, but I can't do that unless 
> people tell me what assistance they need. I really dislike "non-helpful 
> help".
> 

I thought we already beat the life out of this... I simply didn't make the 
connection from the error message to the problematic file. I recieved the 
message after each emerge. It wasn't until after I submitted my first post that 
I saw the similar error in the initialization scripts. I also fond the error 
message when running env-update. It was a slow process of piecing the clues 
together, so I posted here, but I did try to resolve it on my own first...

> "Error found while parsing config files or init scripts" is definitely a 
> somewhat better clue in this case, even though it doesn't tell you what 
> init file to search, so it may not be as helpful as it looks. So, does 
> this mean that in the specific instance of emerge errors involving 
> depcache parsing, the answer is as simple as "fixing" Portage to produce 
> a "custom" error message for that case somehow (i.e. submitting a bug 
> report for Portage)? That would be something "doable", at least.
> 
> Holly
> --
> [email protected] mailing list
> 

Dave

Attachment: pgp6o6tqMRgfg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to