Dave Nebinger <dnebinger <at> joat.com> writes:
> ls -l /etc/make.profile should indicate what profile you're linked to. How come all of those 'use.defaults' files still have 2004.x in the path names instead of 2005.0 ? > I believe the 2005.x standard is to use the > /u/p/p/default-linux/use.defaults; the 2004 version(s) were used by those > specific profiles. In fact if you look at the listing it would appear that > the intention is that the profile-specific use.defaults are extensions to > the d-l/use.defaults file, indicating that at some point along the way it > was determined that no 2005.x specific additions are necessary. Obviously > there are others more qualified than I to answer this one correctly. Thanks, James -- [email protected] mailing list
