After some Googling it appears this kernel is built for Pentium III
even though the hardware (and make.conf) say Pention 4. I am
rebuilding the kernel and modules for Pentium 4.

- Mark

On 6/2/05, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike,
>    Where do I report problems? I seem to have a pretty disastorious
> reboot! I am writing from the machine, so X and netowrking are up, but
> many drivers didn't load and I am seeing many versions of this message
> in demsg: (replace agpgart with many names...)
> 
> agpgart: version magic '2.6.11-gentoo-r6 preempt PENTIUMIII gcc-3.3'
> should be '2.6.11-gentoo-r6 preempt PENTIUM4 gcc-3.3'
> 
>    I hope someone can point me in the right direction to get this fixed ASAP.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark
> 
> On 6/1/05, Paul Varner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Forwarded from gentoo-dev at author's request to gentoo-user
> >
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: baselayout-1.11.12-r2 request for testers
> > Date: 2005-05-25 22:20:02 GMT
> >
> > yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we want to 
> > get
> > new baselayout stable asap', we're serious
> >
> > so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they notice 
> > any
> > regressions ?  the 'best' tests are simply rebooting and seeing if your
> > system comes up :)
> >
> > common gotchas:
> > - many config options have moved from /etc/rc.conf into /etc/conf.d/ files
> > - /etc/hostname and /etc/*domainname have been moved into /etc/conf.d/ files
> > - the net scripts have been completely rewritten thanks to UberLord ... old
> > config styles should work fine, but it's best if you update
> > your /etc/conf.d/net syntax ... just review /etc/conf.d/net.example or this
> > URL: http://dev.gentoo.org/~uberlord/net-book/
> >
> > somethings to note ...
> > regressions with lvm/lvm2/evms will not be considered ... they have had all
> > their code forked into the respective packages and thus are no longer part 
> > of
> > baselayout ... bugs with those packages should be taken up with their
> > respective maintainers
> > -mike
> >
> > --
> > [email protected] mailing list
> >
> >
>

-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to