Sean Crandall wrote: Hi, Can't give much info but think "sash=stand-alone shell", so as the name implies it's mainly for rescue, don't depend on other progs/libs. Could boot/work w/o other parts of a system. HTH. Rumen
>With apologies for my ignorance, what did sash used to do? My >understanding is that busybox is a very small embedded linux for SBCs >and controllers and such (I noticed busybox yesterday too, and it made >me curious as I didn't remember emerging it). > >On 6/4/05, Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Jason Stubbs wrote: >> >> >> >>>On Saturday 04 June 2005 23:02, Bill Roberts wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>My usual "emerge -uavDt world" this morning wanted to emerge busybox. >>>> >>>>It doesn't show as a dependency for anything, and I've never emerged >>>>it for anything. >>>> >>>>Any idea why?? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>I believe it's been added to system in place of sash. It's similarly very >>>small in size but has a much larger feature set that is generally very useful >>>in emergencies. >>> >>>Regards, >>>Jason Stubbs >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Hi, >>The answer *is* above, also emerged busybox and later as it didn't >>depend on anything checked the system with "emerge depclean -pv". The >>result: unmerged "sash". evidently busybox takes the place of sash (in >>system-profile). >>HTH. Rumen >> >> >> >> >> > > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
