James wrote:
Carlos<skyclan<at> gmx.net> writes:
End of dmesg files shows:
usb 2-7: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 7
usb 2-7: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
usb 2-7: USB disconnect, address 7
usb 2-7: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 8
usb 2-7: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
this shows several connection/disconnection cycles
with address either ..../002/007 or .../002/008
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 128 Jun 8 23:54 001
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 129 Jun 8 23:54 002
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 130 Jun 8 23:54 003
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 131 Jun 8 23:54 004
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 135 Jun 16 15:35 008
These devices have the absolute path of
/dev/bus/usb/002/<001,002,003,005 or 008>
How was the device node chosen? It appears there is no device connected
to /dev/bus/usb/002, but rather /dev/bus/usb/008.
see above
Although the software reports a permissions issue, perhaps the problem
is related to a bad choice of device node?
I did nothing to create a device node. Kernel config issue?
Custom udev rule?
dbus trickery?
Hal mystery (need dale on this one....)
Dunno, that's why I posted, as to guidance on using
a motorola (razor) phone with wammu, gammu or any other
cell based software that works reasonably well with gentoo,
are all valid snippets of information, of keen interest to me.
James
I still have hal on here just not for my keyboard and mouse. I did run
into a rules problem one time a good while back, printer I think or
maybe my camera. I removed all the rules and then re-emerged hal. I
then restarted hal and things worked fine. If you use KDE, I would log
out and back in just in case. I would copy them to another location
instead of deleting them tho. You may have one that you need or need to
reference back to, in case it is a bug and you want to report it or
something.
Hope that helps.
Dale
:-) :-)
