Am 03.08.2010 14:52, schrieb Graham Murray: > Nikos Chantziaras <rea...@arcor.de> writes: > >> Git needs to move much less data around than rsync. It only transfers >> differences, not whole files. > > But is uses a *lot* more disk space on the systems as each system > contains the full history. >
While your statement is correct, you can still avoid having the whole history and make a shallow clone. It just doesn't help much because you still need all the metadata: http://blogs.gnome.org/simos/2009/04/18/git-clones-vs-shallow-git-clones/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
