On 14 October 2010 00:38, Dean Matzkov <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, if you were running portage-2-2_rc67, that's already pretty much > bleeding edge =P
Yeah, I was wondering if someone would notice that. :-) > But just out of curiosity, though, is there any particular reason > you're not running a more-stable version of Portage, such as v2.1.8.3 > or v2.1.9.17? The 2.2 release-candidates are hard-masked for a reason > - which includes things randomly breaking, such as this unmerge issue > you experienced. I don't remember exactly but there was a feature I wanted that wasn't in Portage 2.1. I think it was Sets. I believe I needed it (or thought I needed it) to simplify installing KDE.
