On 11/28/2010 08:53 PM, App Deb wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:39 PM, walt<[email protected]> wrote:
I'm confused about which of all these various mechanisms apply to single-cpu
machines. AFAICT Con's BFS (e.g.) is really a CPU scheduler and doesn't
affect
single-cpu machines very much. What about CFQ and group scheduling?
Others?
Thanks for any clues.
Don't mix them,
CFS --> upstream official CPU scheduler (also supports cgroups, that
got used in the 200line patch, which is useless imo)
CFQ --> upstream official I/O (disk) scheduler (afaik the only one
that supports "ionice")
BFS --> ck's CPU scheduler
(I don't know what i/o scheduler ck's patchset uses)
The i/o scheduler doesn't change.
