Iirc there a bug in glibc that makes it almost impossible to create static
binaries with it. I can't look the the sources of that info atm, but it be
easily found with google. Do the other platforms you use gcc to build static
binaries with use a different libc?
On Dec 3, 2010 11:14 AM, "Grant Edwards" <grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2010-12-03, Jacob Todd <jaketodd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Gotta love gcc!
>
> It's not gcc's fault.
>
> I use gcc on other platforms to create static binaries and don't see
> any noticable overhead.
>
>> If you want real static binaries on a unix-ish os, use plan 9.
>
> Except that's not what I want. I want a static binary on Linux.
>
> --
> Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! My Aunt MAUREEN was a
> at military advisor to IKE &
> gmail.com TINA TURNER!!
>
>
