Bill Kenworthy <billk <at> iinet.net.au> writes: > > How is btrfs , from the "driver's seat"?
> I have had one instance of a more serious corruption caused by > some bug in btrfs that needed the latest btrfsck from git to fix > offline - later kernels do not suffer from this apparently. Interesting... BTRFS > Otherwise I have been hammering it as a dirvish backup server and except > for speed its fine - and I wont be able to confirm that the speed issue > is btrfs's fault until I get the partitioning correct - and dirvish is > somewhat unique in what it does so it could be a special case. I found the 4k sectors problem. Weird. btrfs should be fast.... thanks for all the responses, james
