INPUT_DEVICES="keyboard mouse evdev"

On Apr 5, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Mike Bean wrote:

> Well, re-running emerge on the driver set had at least two effects. 1) The 
> segfault address moved, and 2) the backtrace moved, 3) the error changed.
> 
> My xlog: http://pastebin.com/zs5zvEBE
> 
> My usefile: http://pastebin.com/vtvZsumP
> 
> My xorg.conf: http://pastebin.com/qwyE5nsX
> 
> Kinda wish I could stay and comb it, but if I don't get into traffic before 
> rush hour, it'll tack a good 30-45 min onto my commute length.  Will have to 
> go through it when I get home!
> 
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Jeremy McSpadden <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Can you paste our make.conf file ? and the output of " eselect profile list " 
> ?
> 
> On Apr 5, 2011, at 3:15 PM, Mike Bean wrote:
> 
>> That, is an interesting question, because I HAVE been changing USE flags. 
>> When the kernel was built it had a distinctly different use flag set.   Now 
>> it's USE="mmx sse sse2 ssh X -gnome -kde -qt4 dbus jpeg lock session 
>> startup-notification thunar udev -cdr -dvd alsa gtk"
>> 
>> I might be giving myself away as a gentoo noob here, but I haven't 
>> technically built anything.    When you say, "rebuild" are you referring to 
>> basically the same process as emerge?   That's how I got my drivers and 
>> xorg, but when I think of building something I always think of 
>> configure/make/make install, and I want to be sure I'm not doing the wrong 
>> thing because of a misunderstanding
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 05 April 2011 09:58:39 Mike Bean wrote:
>> > Not sure what's going on, hopefully it's a configuration mistake of some
>> > kind.   Sometimes it crashes, sometimes it's intermittent.  My xlog is at
>> > http://pastebin.com/9jsJE8mw
>> > Not really sure how to debug it, all advice is appreciated
>> 
>> well, it is not a driver issue. Your server segfaults. Have you set strange
>> flags? have you rebuild xorg-server and all the stuff it depends on with sane
>> flags?
>> 
>> 
> 
> 



Reply via email to