On Thursday 26 May 2011 11:30:12 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 11:50 on Thursday 26 May 2011, Mick did > opine > > thusly: > > On Thursday 26 May 2011 05:49:21 Valmor de Almeida wrote: > > > On 05/25/2011 04:46 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Valmor de Almeida > > > > <val.gen...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > >> Should these have been eliminated or do I need to do it by hand or > > > >> something else still needs it? > > > > > > > > I think you should do it by hand. > > > > > > > > In general, you can assume portage will never delete any config files > > > > or anything from /etc without your involvement (either manually or > > > > with etc-update or similar). > > > > > > Cleaned by hand. All working. > > > > I just had a look and noticed that haldaemon is added as a user to a load > > of groups. The group 'cdrw' only has haldaemon as a user. What shall I > > do with it? > > > > # less /etc/group | grep haldaemon > > disk:x:6:root,adm,haldaemon > > floppy:x:11:root,haldaemon > > cdrom:x:19:haldaemon,michael > > cdrw:x:80:haldaemon > > haldaemon:x:1004:haldaemon > > plugdev:x:1005:haldaemon,michael > > You should still delete it.
I assume you mean just the haldaemon, not the group cdrw, right? Then I leave the cdrw empty with no users, correct? -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
