On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:50:03PM +0200, Indi wrote: > On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: > > > > I don't think that there is something that can be done, because the > > server changes the headers of the mails. > > > > That is a example of Indi's headers when he was using usenet > > > > References: <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> > > > > That is what his headers look now > > > > References: <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> > > > > The References-header is what most readers use to sort mails into threads. > > > > Well I could be wrong but do believe the MUA wll write the Xref or > References headers according to what the server has on the original > message. If the original header info exists anywhere in the message sent > by the mail2news gateway it should be possible to write a > macro to make mutt retrieve that information and rewrite the headers to > the proper default. > > I'm just a bit tired of fiddling with it right now, but maybe I'll look > into it later... >
This is just a test to see if threading works with the mail2news gateway when the X-Original-Message-ID header data is used to replace the In-Reply-To header's data (as it comes up using the mail2news gateway, of course). -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
