On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:37:59 +0200 (CEST), Alain DIDIERJEAN wrote: > > 2.2, it's listed as ~*2.2.0_alpha41, too early for me. Thanks all for > > the help > > Don't let the ridiculous version number fool you, 2.2 has been > generally usable for a couple of years. > > Oooops, I stupidly thought that "alpha" in version name, which usually > doesn't appear, meant a specially risky version in alpha state... Silly > me.
I'd say the sillyness is in the version number. 2.2 (we're on 2.2.0 now) reached the milestone of 99 release candidates, which is farcical. -- Neil Bothwick I don't have any solution, but I certainly admire the problem.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
