Uwe Thiem wrote: >On 12 August 2005 04:13, Bob Sanders wrote: > > >>On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:40:12 +0100 >> >>Uwe Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>I am puzzled. First I thought that the Gb NIC on box A is somehow kaput >>>but case 1 surely shows it is performing. What the heck is going on here? >>>I would be deeply indebted to any person on this list that could shed >>>some light on this. Any hint what to investigate would be highly >>>appreciated. Really. This has troubled me for the last three days and I >>>would go as far as ship you a Windhoek Lager. ;-) >>> >>> It would probably cost 10 times the price of the lager for shipping. Maybe you should make it a case? I heard that Namibia Breweries is due to stop making Heineken and it's going to SAB? :-)
>>The long timeout before password is probably DNS not working the port >>properly. Just a guess. >> >> > >Nope. Same behaviour when using IP addresses. > > > >>Have you tried - scp, in both directions? >> >> > >Yes, did it now. Surprisingly it transfers data at 2xB/s both ways. Quite >different from sftp. > > > >>And which nfs? V3, V4? I suggest V4, if not. >> >> > >V3 is what nfsstat says. Hmm. I've enabled both, V3 and V4, server- and >client-side. How do I force it to use V4? > > > >>Have you run top and netstat -rn on both boxes to see what they think the >>routing is? >> >> > >Routes are alright. Both boxes have a route to the class C network >(192.168.254.0/24) they are using. > >Uwe > > > Email Disclaimer http://www.aplitec.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm -- [email protected] mailing list
