On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 01:08:24 +0100 Peter Humphrey <pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 06 October 2011 17:40:33 Sebastian Beßler wrote: > > Am 06.10.2011 17:25, schrieb Michael Mol: > > >> Let's hold a poll. How many list readers get it? > > > > > > It's not c which is in doubt, but its function as an upper > > > limit. ;) > > > > And even if the results a true and not an error then there is a > > list of possible explanations. Most of them leave c as upper limit > > in place. Quantum Mechanics has many aces in his sleeve like micro > > wormholes or traveling through higher dimensions. All these > > dimensions from string theorie must be good for something ;-) > > Just think of the consequences if c is not the ultimate speed limit. > I am, and they're so numerous that I can't even contemplate them all. Permit me to direct you to the pearl of wisdom about that in the movie K-Pax -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
