Thanks for your replies.
> Am 23.01.2012 23:03, schrieb walt:
> > Very strange indeed. I just installed both packages and I have no
> > libmix.so.0 either, yet everything works.
> >
> > No idea what's causing your problem, but I agree it's a problem I'd
> > want to solve. I'd try running ldconfig -p and lddtree /usr/bin/nc
> > to see where the .0 is coming from. (lddtree is from pax-utils).
For completeness:
(for dev-libs/libmix-2.05-r5 after symlink created)
ldconfig -p | grep libmix =
libmix.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libmix.so.0
libmix++.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libmix++.so.0
and output from lddtree /usr/bin/nc =
nc => /usr/bin/nc (interpreter => /lib/ld-linux.so.2)
libmix.so.0 => /usr/lib/libmix.so.0
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6
* Felix Kuperjans <[email protected]> [2012-01-23 23:13:26 +0100]:
> I ran into this problem some time ago, it seems the ebuild
> dev-libs/libmix-2.05-r5 is broken. It does no longer create a symlink
> from libmix.so.0 to libmix.so.
Though it worked with the symlink, as you suggested, I upgraded libmix
anyway.
Thanks again.
Regards,
--
Merv Hammer
