On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Michael Mol <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> I guess you mean https://panopticlick.eff.org/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> My results from work: >>>> >>>> Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 1,939,102 tested >>>> so far. >>>> >>>> Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that >>>> conveys at least 20.89 bits of identifying information. >>>> >>> >>> >>> Funny, I get exactly the same thing except add one to the large number. >>> I guess you tested before I did. How does one avoid this but still >>> have sites work? >> >> Well, I just went to the same site using a Chrome 'incognito' browser, >> and got this: >> >> Within our dataset of several million visitors, only one in 969,560 >> browsers have the same fingerprint as yours. >> >> Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that >> conveys 19.89 bits of identifying information. > > Within our dataset of visitors, one in 0 browsers have the same > fingerprint as yours. > > Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that > conveys INF bits of identifying information. > > I think I broke it. I win? :)
Who knows? You may have only broken you way of seeing the results. ^^ -- :wq
