On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 17:38, Pandu Poluan <pa...@poluan.info> wrote: > Silly me... > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 17:23, Pandu Poluan <pa...@poluan.info> wrote: >> >> 1. Should I file a bugreport for xtables-addons-1.39? >> >> 2. Or should I request for xtables-addons-1.41 in the portage tree? >> >> >> [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtables-addons/files/Xtables-addons/ >> >> > > Upstream's 1.41 already incorporated the necessary fixes for > xtables-addons to be compilable on kernel 3.2/3.3: > > http://xtables-addons.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=xtables-addons/xtables-addons;a=commitdiff;h=076610e3af86b4b3f87f9c7811d36e38ec8a39cd > > So there's just one question: Why haven't the package maintainer pull > xtables-addons-1.41 into the portage tree? >
Bugs #397749, #403749, and #405197, apparently. Rgds, -- FdS Pandu E Poluan ~ IT Optimizer ~ • LOPSA Member #15248 • Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com • Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
