On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:51:23 +0100 Neil Bothwick <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:47:06 -0500, Dale wrote: > > > > Why not post the details of it? All an initramfs is is an init > > > script and a few binaries. Extract the init script, the initramfs > > > file is a plain cpio archive, and post it here. > > > > I did post it a week or so ago in another thread. > > The init script? I didn't see it, which thread? > > > Yea, I know all that. They are breaking one thing to fix something > > else so that they don't have to deal with fixing what they broke. > > I got that a long time ago. ;-) > > I'm coming round to the point of view that the breakage predates udev > by many years. The whole idea of having four directories for binaries > and two for libraries is an inelegance that I have come to accept > over the years but only because it is "the way we have always done it" four and two? You're the lucky one. I have six and three minimally on every server, plus however many the proprietary fellows felt like sticking in /opt.... -- Alan McKinnnon [email protected]
