On 2012-03-29 01:20, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I'm in favour of /bin and /lib, and I see the pros and cons of
> /sbin and am not too bothered about how that is done. But having
> two (or more) of each of these is an artificial mess that is a
> solution to a problem that
As I said, it's a matter of taste.
> Red Hat employ devs working on many aspects of Linux, and we
> should be grateful for this (or do you prefer the Ubuntu approach
> of taking with little giving back?). One of the reasons Greg K-H
> left SUSE to work for
I did say that my writing was speculative? And I never claimed Greg
K-H is/was working for Redhat. Anyway, for the record I have always
had a great respect and admiration for both Redhat and Greg K-H (which
I see as a very good and knowledgeable kernel hacker) but this latest
debacle has taken it down a few notches... On the other hand I would
prefer Ubuntus approach to someone (anyone) pushing bad designs any
day ("speaking" hypothetically and generally without pointing out
anyone or any company). But this is quite pointless (my whining)
since, as someone else mentioned, "code talks...". Perhaps some day I
can find the time to hack my own solution (which of course will be
perfection ;-) ).
:-)
Best regards
Peter K
