On Thursday, April 19, 2012 04:12:35 PM Michael Mol wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Alex Schuster <wo...@wonkology.org> wrote:
> > Michael Mol writes:
> >> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Alex Schuster <wo...@wonkology.org>
> >> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > New output:
> >> > eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
> >> >        inet 192.168.2.42  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast
> >> > 192.168.2.255 inet6 fe80::be5f:f4ff:fe19:ad18  prefixlen 64  scopeid
> >> > 0x20<link>
> >> > 
> >> >        ether bc:5f:f4:19:ad:18  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
> >> 
> >> There it is.
> > 
> > Wow. Now I feel really stupid. Because I am. I have no idea why I have
> > overlooked this.
> > 
> > Sorry for the noise!
> 
> I didn't see it right away, either. I found it by noticing your MAC in
> your old output, and searched for a substring of it in your new
> output.
> 
> Incidentally, you can derive it from your IPv6 LL address, but that's
> a bit of a roundabout way, and may not work if you've disabled IPv6.

How do you derive it?
I don't see the mac-address in the inet6 address.

--
Joost

Reply via email to