Willie Matthews wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/19/12 04:13, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
>> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Adam Carter <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Which is the best caching dns server? I'm presently using pdns-recursor,
>>>> which is quite good, but doesn't have option to set minimum ttl (doesn't
>>>> make sense, but some sites like twitter have ridiculously low ttl of 30s).
>>> The load balancing technology will be slow to respond if the TTLs are
>>> high, so given that responsive load balancing and timely fail over are
>>> good things, it does make sense. IIRC the F5 default is 20 seconds. Be
>>> careful if you are going to break DNS, there may be consequences
>>> you're not aware of.
>>>
>> I know that. Just experimenting things, because if I can cache it
>> locally, it would be quicker for me.
>>
>>>> Also, it isn't able to save cached entries to file so that it can be
>>>> restored on next boot. Any option?
>>>>
>>>> I am keeping my box 24x7 on because it serves as dns on my small home wifi,
>>>> not acceptable to me, because network is almost off at night (only phone)
>>>> and I have my router as secondary dns.
>>> Can you re-phrase that? - its hard to understand what the problem is.
>>>
>> Persistence across multiple boots/reboots.
>>
>> I found pdnsd which can do that, trying that out now.
>>
> You should really try changing you DNS server to some faster ones. I was
> having this same problem with my ISP or DSL modem with built in router
> taking a long time. I changed my DNS servers to Google DNS Servers
> (8.8.4.4 and 8.8.8.8) and haven't had a problem.
> 
> My setup is a little different but all in all I would really suggest you
> try a DNS server outside of your ISP.
> 


I agree.  My ISP is AT&T and I changed my DNS to Google's too.  It is
very fast compared to AT&T's servers.  I have had AT&T's servers not
respond for several seconds but Google's just seem to work.

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
how you interpreted my words!

Miss the compile output?  Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"

Reply via email to