On Fri, 25. May 13:47, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:41 PM, 1126 > <mailingli...@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote: > > Hello list! > > > > When I run revdep-rebuild, it keeps repeating the same steps over and over > > again. > > > > Here is what I mean: > > > > * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild > > > > * Checking reverse dependencies > > * Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package update > > * will be emerged. > > > > * Collecting system binaries and libraries > > * Generated new 1_files.rr > > * Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > * Generated new 2_ldpath.rr > > * Checking dynamic linking consistency > > [ 36% ] * broken /usr/lib32/libavdevice.so.53.4.100 (requires > > libpulse-simple.so.0 > > libpulse.so.0) > > [ 100% ] > > * Generated new 3_broken.rr > > * Assigning files to packages > > * /usr/lib32/libavdevice.so.53.4.100 -> > > app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs > > * Generated new 4_raw.rr and 4_owners.rr > > * Cleaning list of packages to rebuild > > * Generated new 4_pkgs.rr > > * Assigning packages to ebuilds > > * Generated new 4_ebuilds.rr > > * Evaluating package order > > * Generated new 5_order.rr > > * All prepared. Starting rebuild > > emerge --complete-graph=y --oneshot > > app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs:0 > > .......... > > Calculating dependencies... done! > > > >>>> Verifying ebuild manifests > > > >>>> Emerging (1 of 1) app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520 > > * emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520.tar.xz RMD160 SHA1 SHA256 size ;-) ... > > [ ok ] > >>>> Unpacking source... > >>>> Unpacking emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520.tar.xz to > > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work > >>>> Source unpacked in > > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work > >>>> Preparing source in > > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work ... > >>>> Source prepared. > >>>> Configuring source in > > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work ... > >>>> Source configured. > >>>> Compiling source in > > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work ... > >>>> Source compiled. > >>>> Test phase [not enabled]: app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520 > > > >>>> Install emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520 into > > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/image/ > > category > > app-emulation > >>>> Completed installing emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520 into > > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/image/ > > > > > > * QA Notice: The following files contain runtime text relocations > > * Text relocations force the dynamic linker to perform extra > > * work at startup, waste system resources, and may pose a security > > * risk. On some architectures, the code may not even function > > * properly, if at all. > > * For more information, see http://hardened.gentoo.org/pic-fix-guide.xml > > * Please include the following list of files in your report: > > * TEXTREL usr/lib32/libx264.so.120 > > > > > >>>> Installing (1 of 1) app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520 > >>>> Auto-cleaning packages... > > > >>>> No outdated packages were found on your system. > > > > * GNU info directory index is up-to-date. > > * Build finished correctly. Removing temporary files... > > * You can re-run revdep-rebuild to verify that all libraries and binaries > > * are fixed. Possible reasons for remaining inconsistencies include: > > * orphaned files > > * deep dependencies > > * packages installed outside of portage's control > > * specially-evaluated libraries > > > > > > It keeps complaining about libavdevice.so and them re-emerges > > app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520. > > > > > > When I would re-run it right now, it would again complain about libavdevice > > and > > would again re-emerge app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs.. > > > > Has anyone any idea how to fix this? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Christian. > > > > > > This is bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416751 > > Bugzilla+search is your friend ;) >
Thanks, a friend I somehow forgot to ask this time ;)
