On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Michael Hampicke <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip] > As Michael Mol already said, tmpfs for the run dir is not a bad thing, > it, it does not eat all your ram :) > I however have a different question: Why do we need a new /run when we > already have /var/run. There's no mention of /run in the FHS either. > I only see udev stuff under /run - So it's another crazy udev thing? :) Neil had the best response to that, IMO: "It makes sure that /run is available and writeable early in the boot process, whereas /var/run may not be and / may be mounted ro." -- :wq
