On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Dmitry Goncharov <dgoncha...@users.sf.net> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:56:01PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Dmitry Goncharov >> <dgoncha...@users.sf.net> wrote: >> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:52:12PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote: >> >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Mol <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Wow. Just wow. This is incredible. >> >> >> >> This is repeatable for me. >> >> >> > <snip> >> >> * The problem occurred while executing the ebuild file named >> >> * 'glibc-2.14.1-r3.ebuild' located in the '/var/db/pkg/sys- >> >> >> > <snip> >> >> CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=core2 -mcx16 -msahf >> >> --param l1-cache-size=32 --param l1-cache-line-size=64 --param >> >> l2-cache-size=4096 -mtune=core2 -ggdb3" >> >> CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" >> > >> > Can you upgrage to glibc-2.15? >> >> Sure. It's going to be another full reinstall. >> >> > Can you tweak you gcc flags to something more conventional and see if the >> > problem persists? >> >> Those CFLAGS should be equivalent to: >> CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -ggdb3 --march=native". >> >> But I'll try making it just -O2 -pipe --march=native. >> >> > If you are interested in submitting a patch to the upstream then you can >> > build >> > the glibc test suite with your gcc flags and check if the tests pass. >> >> If it gets things fixed. I have two machines which have been offline >> for almost two months from this. >> >> -- >> :wq >> > Also, which gcc are you using? Can you try a different version?
It updated gcc immediately before glibc, IIRC, so I expect it's newest stable. Kaylee is offline until I do a new reinstall again, but it looks like latest stable in portage is 4.5.3-r2. -- :wq