On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:41:09 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote: > Besides that, it's not so easy to do the alignment, at least when using > LVM. I read that LVM adds 192K header information, so even if you align > the partition start to an erasable block size of 512K, the actual > content is not aligned. See [*] for information how to overcome this. > That is, if you believe the alignment to erasable blocks is important, > personally I do not know what to think now. It wouldn't hurt, so why > not apply it, but it seems like snake oil to me now. > > Wonko > > http://tytso.livejournal.com/2009/02/20/
I think that may be out of date. I read that but then found somewhere that LVM now uses MiB alignment. -- Neil Bothwick When there's a will, I want to be in it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
