On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Michael Mol <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Pandu Poluan <pa...@poluan.info> wrote: >> >> On Sep 20, 2012 10:04 PM, "Michael Mol" <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> >>> wrote: >>> > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:13:08 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> > >>> >> On the archive: >>> >> >>> >> find /root/of/dir/structure -type d > dirs.txt >>> >> find /root/of/dir/structure -type f > files.txt >>> > >>> > This will add '/root/of/dir/structure' to the start of each path. would >>> > it be better to do? >>> > >>> > cd /root/of/dir/structure >>> > find -type d > ../dirs.txt >>> > find -type f > ../files.txt >>> >>> I see your path correction, and raise you: >>> * whitespace-safe folders >>> * Automatic copy to remote system. >>> * Automatic new file and folder creation >>> * Using those pretty xargs parameters. >>> >>> cd /root/of/dir/structure >>> find . -type d -print0 > ~/dirs.txt >>> find . -type d -print0 > ~/files.txt >>> >>> scp dirs.txt files.txt remote.system: >>> >>> ssh remote.system <<ENDSSH >>> cd /root/of/new/structure >>> cat ~/dirs.txt|xargs -0 mkdir -p >>> cat ~/files.txt|xargs -0 touch >>> ENDSSH >>> >>> >> >> Cool... except that your raise is invalid (should've used -type f in the 3rd >> line)... >> >> ;-) >> > > Heh. It's also performing a bunch of unnecessary mkdir commands. I > mean, "find -type d" isn't going to return a subpath of a folder until ^^ s/subpath/subfolder/ ^^
-- :wq
