Grant Edwards <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2012-12-02, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Mick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>> Is this a laptop? with no num pad? On my laptop the numpad is mapped to
> >>> the
> >>> keys like you described, so when Num Lock is toggled those keys function
> >>> as
> >>> the num pad.
> >>
> >> You can check if rc-update -s -v | grep numlock (or rc-status -s | grep
> >> numlock) shows it being set, otherwise add it to see if this makes a
> >> difference.
> >
> > I think numlock is on by default in newer kernels
>
> That pretty much sucks. Is that configurable sowewhere?
>
> > -- just turn it off with the key
>
> The Numlock key doesn't work with the 3.5 kernel.
>
> > -- I am pretty sure even your laptop has such a simulated key.
>
> My keyboard does have a numlock key, but it doesn't turn numlock on/off
> with the 3.5 kernel.
At least with 3.6 kernel and above, the numlock key does work -- I am
using a desktop with the regular keyboard. So I wonder if you go to 3.6
will it be any better?
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici
[email protected]
