Mark David Dumlao wrote: > I think your reaction proves my point about angry mobs torching his > home without understanding what's being proposed. Your fine reading > comprehension once again failed to catch the notion that in my > analogy, all he invented was a mechanism that makes sure it was a key, > not a spark plug, that did the starting. i.e., you're asking literally > for a turnkey system, and that's literally what he invented, except > that the system guarantees that it's a key that was turned. You have > not said a THING about your misunderstanding of the use of the word > _broken_ and you're continuing to peddle your hate-boner even after > it's been shown that you're confused. -- This email is: [ ] actionable > [ ] fyi [x] social Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no > Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none
So I guess Linus is confused to? You think he is just a hate-boner? I would think Linus if anyone knows what he is talking about. Maybe you need to go talk to him about his feeling on the direction of udev/systemd. Good luck with that. Name calling, lost argument. No more facts. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
