Florian Philipp wrote: > Am 10.02.2013 17:39, schrieb Dale: > [...] >>> >> >> Actually, I had something that wouldn't start and said it needed /run. >> I didn't have one, found references with google that it was the new and >> upcoming thing, so I created it myself. So, it must have been a bug >> that should have been reported but I didn't realize that. By creating >> it myself, I created a bit of a problem. Now what to do about it. >> > > I guess the simplest approach is: > 1. drop into single user runlevel (`rc single`) > 2. move the remnants from /var/run to /run > 3. symlink /var/run to /run > 4. reboot or go back to default runlevel (`rc default`) > > Hope this helps, > Florian Philipp > >
Since you mention rc single. I did that a good while back. Afterwards I went to boot runlevel then to the default runlevel. When I got to the default runlevel, it was not working like it should. I rebooted and everything was back to normal. Have you ever ran into that? It's been a while, most likely when the openrc change was going on. Just curious. I may give that a try. That sounds like a plan. I'll be ready for a reboot tho, just in case. lol Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
