Am 31.03.2013 21:55, schrieb Neil Bothwick: > On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:40:09 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > >>> instead of pushing a completely >>> different (and possibly less reliable) naming scheme by default. >> Whilst I wouldn't want them changing on me (though if your physically >> changing the pci slot then you should be able to handle the number >> change). > What about USB network adaptors? A user may not even realise they plugged > it into a different USB slot from last time, yet the device name changes. > > congratulation, you just found another reason why today's udev sucks.
- Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and pe... William Kenworthy
- Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persiste... Kevin Chadwick
- Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and per... Neil Bothwick
- Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and... Michael Mol
- Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and... Kevin Chadwick
- Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update... Neil Bothwick
- Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev up... Pandu Poluan
- Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev up... Neil Bothwick
- Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev up... Michael Mol
- Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev up... Kevin Chadwick
- Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and... Volker Armin Hemmann
- Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update... Neil Bothwick
- Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and per... Neil Bothwick