Are you using 802.1x or wireless on that machine? If not, I can't think
of a reason you'd need it, outside of it being a hard dependency of some
other package.

On 04/07/2013 10:22 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Installing wpa_supplicant got the network scripts working again. Not
> sure why..... Does anyone know why we need wpa_supplication now?
> 
> On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis <sym...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am upgrading each package (25) one by one, and leaving the meat and
>> potatoes (udev) for last. I am really sorry about the noise guys and
>> gals. It's been a while since I had such a scare....
>> There are 4500 people coming into work tomorrow morning, and this
>> machine also happens to be our LDAP server.
>>
>> N.
>>
>> On 4/7/13, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 09:38:23 -0400, Nick Khamis wrote:
>>>
>>>> Double checking the udevd version we are running 171. Not sure if we
>>>> should be effected yet? I confess, I did a world upgrade and walked
>>>> away. For some reason it was stuck on ipr.h for some apache related
>>>> package, which was odd since apache is not installed on the machine.
>>>> I reset the system and poof!!!! Here I am at the co-location on Sunday
>>>> at 9:00am.
>>>> Serves me right I guess.....
>>>>
>>>> I double checked. When deleting 70-something rules and restarting the
>>>> machine they get regenerated.
>>>
>>> That's how udev-171 was supposed to work. You need to update to 200 then
>>> delete the file and it will stay deleted.
>>>
>>> You really need to read the news item and associated page CAREFULLY, then
>>> work through them CAREFULLY and the upgrade should do just what you want.
>>>
>>> udev, or whatever device manager you choose, is a critical system
>>> component, not the sort of thing you should leave to update itself
>>> without reading the instructions, especially on a remote server.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Neil Bothwick
>>>
>>> MICROSOFT: Most Intelligent Customers Realize Our Software Only Fools
>>> Teenagers
>>>
>>
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to