On 12.06.2013 06:57, Norman Rieß wrote:
> Am 11.06.2013 16:19, schrieb Nick Khamis:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Was wondering what people are running these days, and how do they
>> compare to the 10,000 dollar SAN boxes. We are looking to build a fiber
>> san using IET and glusterFS, and was wondering what kind of luck people
>> where having using this approach, or any for that matter.
> 
> the question is, what are you doing with it and why do you think you
> need a fibre channel SAN.
> Our goal indeed is to get rid of the SAN infrastructure as it is
> delicately to all kinds of failure with nearly zero fault tolerance.
> An example, you have an hicup or a power failure in your network. SAN is
> dead from nowon and must be reinitialized on the server. Simple NFS
> comes back up without any fuzz.
> Another, you boot your storage systems due to an os update or something
> like that. Your SAN will be dead. NFS will just go on as if nothing
> happened.
> We use netapp storage systems which are NAS and SAN capable.
> Another point is, that if you have a SAN lun, there is either no way to
> increase or decrease size on the fly, on cifs or nfs you can resize your
> share on the go.
> 
> So if you do not have a _really_ good reason to use a fribre channel
> SAN, don't!

Hello,

I tend to disagree. A correctly designed SAN (using dual Fabric among
other things) is a lot more stable and has a lot better performance than
any NAS (NFS, CIFS, iSCSI) solution. One other thing that also needs to
be correctly configured to have a stable SAN infrastructure is the
servers on it (Multipathing, partition alignment, queue depth, ...)
according to the storage vendors recommendation.
LUN expansion/shrink is storage vendor specific, some can not (netapp
apparently) but others can.

Just my 2 cents.

Regards,
-- 
Dan Johansson, <http://www.dmj.nu>
***************************************************
This message is printed on 100% recycled electrons!
***************************************************

Attachment: 0x2FB894AD.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to