On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 11:52:26 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > > but the issue here was eudev *not* being updated when the virtual > > was, and both cause and result were quite clear. > > Right, but I was talking about not updating *anything* related to any > mission critical apps, and that would include the virtual/udev as well. > > That said - shouldn't this be taken care of by the the virtual/udev > package itself? Shoudln't it keep track of what versions of udev *and* > eudev it supports, and warn you (via a [B]blocker)?
There was a blocker (small b) because virtual/udev needed sys-fs/udev and that gave a blocker that uninstalled eudev. -- Neil Bothwick The present never ages. Each moment is like a snowflake, unique, unspoiled, unrepeatable, and can be appreciated in its surprisingness.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
