-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/2013 02:07 PM, Mick wrote: > On Monday 09 Sep 2013 14:42:28 Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> On 09/09/2013 01:28 AM, Mick wrote: >>> Are you saying that 2048 RSA keys are no good anymore? >> >> They're probably fine, but when you're making them yourself, the >> extra bits are free. I would assume that the NSA can crack >> 1024-bit RSA[1], so why not jump to 4096 so you don't have to do >> this again in a few years? > > Right, but my router won't work with keys larger than 2048 and its > admin GUI is controlled with 1024-bit public certificate. >
How often do you need to admin the router? Just do it from home (i.e. on the LAN side). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSLiCIAAoJEBxJck0inpOiOxUQAKLD/ZpyhmdbyKYhw8git9A9 omPhNJPrIiRFNiw2uS9RrdRTqNaoAQyzRy8QkyfQK5MxYqSR7Xf3YUFv/fNXiahS pT3wSi9OVmaJQ7p5yHkmEdPTp30nhg53kFFeZ6h2Qd1BQ9GmzCoq5ajPavLoIreF DMjpLAsE3fY+1JcMe1qbyqfrAGrfpVrh2h5VdMneIFe2t8/yRQKX5F/z6JWnb8/V pdHQfFkybnJOiul1aLy/C/wKKyHVcrFvpM8QwhfGuDVY/q9h9gg99QN/5KqtahfJ jAuzaygTcSHsYfxNzf83ik0O25RR7UJ/dW4YGbK+PCb11RQZ3i/scxkuW3y11DGS iFMT9bQAP8InqUi8lWawu5fNwJBGlMgbHIYbkzpd/9U2YSQBbjJJgyOczsLcL8cC S8F9i8LqhRW3w6IczSGq6rt51gFgSVpBNaysJprq95Ei3/ZoAZY/jcpKAZhlV0wS 3xRCkiNBjPcyTHuSV5Z4QzgLB77EtO8fdV6vIBshY5zdX1jXFA8n5jKgb9tmTCKQ Eu6c1VvmJ4sIS437UgVcMVs7c08rp5qI3BhM1uKVuD/PIuQkaTnT6MZ57+AsvCjc hQ+tKaDhrnxY1aHkSwimtKKZKTZxmpi6TuMC+kxE9Ytl6/Br5IJhg0QcqZAUY06W A6X/s6n7XYboLXBiBg4c =N9w5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
