On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 09:36:46AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
> I'm tryint to emerge: gtk+-2.24.19 on one of my x86
> but I'm getting:
> there are no ebuilds to satisfy "=x11-libs/gtk+-2.24.19".
>
> package.keywords has:
> =x11-libs/gtk+-2.24.19 ~x86
That version is no longer in portage:
mingdao@baruch ~ $ eshowkw x11-libs/gtk+
Keywords for x11-libs/gtk+:
| | u |
| a a p s | n |
| l m h i m m p s p | u s | r
| p d a p a 6 i p c 3 a x | s l | e
| h 6 r p 6 8 p p 6 9 s r 8 | e o | p
| a 4 m a 4 k s c 4 0 h c 6 | d t | o
---------------+---------------------------+-----+-------
1.2.10-r12 | + + + + + o ~ + + o + + + | o 1 | gentoo
---------------+---------------------------+-----+-------
2.24.16 | o o o o o o o o o + o o o | o 2 | gentoo
[I]2.24.17 | + + + + + o ~ + + o + + + | o | gentoo
2.24.22 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ | o | gentoo
---------------+---------------------------+-----+-------
[I]3.4.4 | + + + + + o ~ + + + + + + | o 3 | gentoo
3.6.3-r3 | ~ ~ + ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ | o | gentoo
3.8.4 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ | # | gentoo
3.8.6 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ | o | gentoo
By putting =category/package-atom in package.accept_keywords (not
package.keywords) you have limited it to that one single version and unstable
package.
Also, you need not put ~arch in package.accept_keywords because that file will
pull whatever the latest version is available for category/package.
Try changing your "=x11-libs/gtk+-2.24.19 ~x86" to "x11-libs/gtk+" and emerge
again.
Or, because you appear to have two separate issues here...
> I've created manifest in:
> ebuild /usr/local/portage/x11-libs/gtk+/gtk+-2.24.19.ebuild manifest
> Appending /usr/local/portage to PORTDIR_OVERLAY...
> >>> Creating Manifest for /usr/local/portage/x11-libs/gtk+
Now, if you have created your own local overlay and ebuild, you need to also
provide the source and needed patches for x11-libs/gtk+-2.24.19
--
Happy Penguin Computers >')
126 Fenco Drive ( \
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^
supp...@happypenguincomputers.com
662-269-2706 662-205-6424
http://happypenguincomputers.com/
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting
