On 03/01/14 15:34, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 03/01/2014 09:25, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >> Am 03.01.2014 07:52, schrieb Alan McKinnon: >>> On 03/01/2014 00:46, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >>>> BFQ only for the SSDs ? >>> >>> Yes. The scheduler knows how to deal with SSDs while keeping everything >>> responsive even under load. >>> >>> BFQ seems a good fit for your workcase - desktop/laptop. For those, >>> interactive performance is the most important thing. >> >> So you set BFQ for the SSDs and CFQ for the hdds ? I have both in my >> desktop. >> >> >> >> > > BFQ for both is the recommendation. > > But do try it both ways to see how it performs and compare. >
hmm, is BFQ good for VM's too? I am currently using noops (storage is ceph) and was going to experiment but have not had the time yet. BillK
