On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Jc García <[email protected]> wrote: > 2014-05-14 9:51 GMT-06:00 Canek Peláez Valdés <[email protected]>: >> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:42 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Canek Peláez Valdés <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:05 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> [snip] >>>> > I am using version 037 and the command line was very simple >>>> >>>> As I told you in [1], the 037 version has problems with LVM; please >>>> also check the thread in [2], specially the post in [3]. >>>> >>>> Please try again with dracut-036-r4. >>>> >>>> Regards. >>>> >>>> [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/274340 >>>> [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/274152 >>>> [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg145647.html >>>> (for some reason it doesn't appear in gmane). >>> portage won't let me downgrade unless I downgrade systemd to 2.10 -- >>> should I do that? >> >> You mean 210. I'm on 208; my LVM test system is basically stable. >> >> However Jc says he's got it to work with dracut 037-r1; perhaps try >> that version first? >> >> What I do know is that with dracut 037, me and Stefan ran intro troubles. >> > I described it as a 'workaround' in my first post, aware of the fact > that the behavior is not normal, but dracut acctually gives help > finding this workaround, wich is telling the kernel what LVs to use at > boot.
Sorry, I forgot about that. I just tried my test LVM system with dracur-037-r1 and it didn't work. I have not tried yet your workaround, but there is obviously something fishy going on with the latest version of dracut; I would stay with 036-r4. I will try your workaround, although my system is a little more complicated, since it uses RAID and LUKS besides LVM. Regards. -- Canek Peláez Valdés Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
